The Remake of The Thing is Better Than the Original

When it comes to horror movies, few have captured the imagination of audiences quite like "The Thing." Based on the 1938 novella "Who Goes There?" by John W. Campbell Jr., the story of a shape-shifting alien creature that infiltrates a remote Antarctic research station has been adapted several times over the years. However, perhaps none are as well-known or beloved as the 1982 remake of the original 1951 film. While the original may have been a classic in its own right, there are several reasons why the 1982 version is ultimately a superior film.

First and foremost, the 1982 "The Thing" boasts more realistic special effects. While the 1951 film relied on traditional makeup and practical effects, the 1982 version utilised state-of-the-art animatronics and puppetry to bring the shape-shifting creature to life. The result is a creature that is more menacing, more grotesque, and ultimately more memorable than its predecessor. The film's iconic blood test scene, in which the crew attempts to determine who among them has been replaced by the alien, is a prime example of the incredible practical effects that were utilised in the film.

Another factor that sets the 1982 "The Thing" apart from the original is its greater emphasis on suspense and tension. While the 1951 film was a more straightforward sci-fi horror movie, the 1982 version plays more like a psychological thriller. Director John Carpenter expertly builds tension throughout the film, using a mix of atmospheric music, tight editing, and jump scares to keep the audience on the edge of their seat. The result is a film that is far more engaging and emotionally impactful than its predecessor.

In addition to its superior effects and suspense, the 1982 "The Thing" also benefits from a more nuanced approach to its characters. While the crew of the original film was made up of one-dimensional archetypes, the 1982 version features a more diverse and fleshed-out cast. From Kurt Russell's grizzled lead character MacReady to Keith David's tough but compassionate Childs, the crew members are all given distinct personalities and motivations. This not only makes the film more engaging, but also raises the stakes when it comes to the creature's attempts to infiltrate and destroy the group.

Of course, one could argue that the 1951 "The Thing" should be given credit for pioneering the sci-fi horror genre on film. After all, it was one of the earliest examples of a film that blended sci-fi and horror elements into a cohesive whole. However, while the original may have been a trailblazer, it ultimately fails to hold up against the 1982 remake. The latter film takes the foundation laid by the original and builds upon it, creating a more engaging, suspenseful, and ultimately terrifying horror classic.

In conclusion, while the original "The Thing" may have been a classic of its time, it is the 1982 remake that has truly stood the test of time. With its superior effects, expertly crafted suspense, and more nuanced approach to its characters, the later film is a superior work that continues to terrify audiences over four decades after its release.